"This member [judiciary] of the Government was at first considered as the most harmless and helpless of all its organs. But it has proved that the power of declaring what the law is, ad libitum, by sapping and mining slyly and without alarm the foundations of the Constitution, can do what open force would not dare to attempt."

--Thomas Jefferson to Edward Livingston, 1825. ME 16:114

No Law at All

Disillusioned by what we are not and what we have become after some 200 foreign “incursions” and 200 years as a nation maybe telling.  Sadly collective immoral force and thought triumph daily despite the written law.  The Milgram experiments (why did those Germans kill all those Jews and subsequent book Obedience to Authority) in the 1960's and as personal observations everywhere confirm most humans are immoral even without seducements of money and power.  Juries and judges alike ignore not only the law but its very essence; morality.  As America cascades into the abyss of illegitimacy and the light goes out on the beacon to humanity many of us watch in dismay, confused why the population at large still doesn't understand the simplest of precepts which would prevent their ultimate economic or corporeal demise.  Not only God but natural law demands thou shalt not lie, thou shalt not steal, and thou shalt not kill because to do so creates an absolute right of self-defense.  It is suicide.

Attempting to legitimize an immoral act is not, and can never be lawful.  It is a crime to steal, to commit perjury, to extort because is threatens a person's very existence. Regardless whether you are a plantation owner or a government, slavery in any form and the force necessary to extract benefit from living human beings against their will is immoral and therefore unlawful.  In America as elsewhere apparently camouflaged slavery is still legal despite our fundamental law, the Constitution.  Trials today are no longer conducted by the 800 year old precept of juries-of-peers but by anyone off the street having never read our Constitution, knowing nothing of their duty to judge the law; including the facts, nor seemingly having given a thought to right and wrong.  We have fallen so far from morality that today American juries would surely convict Jesus without remorse. No matter how you disguise a reprobate whether clad in the floweriest rhetoric for the noblest of causes, immoral acts, like theft by coercion or fraud, bearing false witness by the standard of honesty and not candor, to deprive a sacred living human being of the right of freedom, his right to use his short time here on Earth to do as he sees fit by his own God given free will, is absolutely repugnant. 

Our "legal" system is broken and corrupt when one can be fined, arrested, or indicted for neither harming another human being nor damaging property.  And what standing do legal precedents have that are founded in immorality?  None.  The application of precedents and stare decisis in and of themselves are fundamentally immoral for they ignore the reality that human beings and facts to a case are always unique and they pervert fundamental law by elevating the findings of a particular case e.g. "case law" above adherence to our common law constitution or fundamental right and wrong. In essence these acts are no different, no they are more egregious than treason for to ignore fundamental law, having sworn to their protection and defense, is a crime not only against Americans but humanity.  These are crimes not unlike a foster parent pedophile so egregious they are almost incomprehensible. Precedent and stare decisis could never exist if in fact a moral, lawful trial was adjudicated by a jury because what jury would have a reason to know details of a prior case?  The jury is interested only in the instant case, as they should be. It is not a “trial by judge” but a “trial by jury” of which Americans brag. Trials by individual persons e.g. judges, have always been known to be a farce and miscarriage of justice, and that is why jury trials are mandated for any $20 infraction.  The only legitimate duty of a judge is to referee prosecutor and defendant not to manipulate the out come of the trial by manipulating procedures and evidence.  The jury is supposed to conduct the trial and pass sentence, not the judge.  

In all human history there is not a government which has not bled its population to the point of rebellion because never has government and those who feed at its illegitimate trough been able, like so many addicts, to resist their escalating lust for greed and power.  Unfortunately we have not yet fashioned the tools necessary to keep government from turning upon its citizen charges, unless by good fortune the Judicial Accountability Initiative Law is enacted requiring lawyers and their counter parts in black dresses to adhere to the law.

Government's only legitimate role to protect the rights of a single human being against others, has been trumped by a myriad of illegitimate laws and lawyers condoned through judicial "misconduct" and complicity fashioning a society legitimizing wrongdoing.  But before you single out the lawyers consider nearly every citizen, through the unconstitutional financial system, is a complicit criminal whether they wish to recognize their criminal behavior or not. Our counterfeit money and credit is in the final analysis paid in full by those who have no credit, the poor not only here but abroad through inflation (the only source of which is printing money). How do those without extraordinary profits retire when a dollar is worth a nickel twenty years later? How is it that citizens are forbidden to counterfeit but bankers can earn 45%+ interest on money they don’t even have? I know how this helps the bankers, some borrowers, and elite government officials, but how does theft benefit society? We have jumped over the bridge hoping the bungee cord won’t break falling ever closer to civil war and this time most likely Armageddon.  One is hard pressed to cite a single fundamental provision of our Constitution that is in force today or any of the precepts once considered fundamental to valid law.  When God’s law or our fundamental law is not understandable by the common man and is considered open to interpretation it is no law at all.  When penalties exist where no person or property has been damaged then it is no law at all.  When rights are conferred by collective consent they are not rights at all.  When there is no legitimate law but only force it is not long before rebellion is the only choice.  The people’s rules for governance, our Constitution, by declaration and convention of the lawyers, is not worth the paper it is written on.  Noble in its intent our Constitution is for all intended purposes now nearly wholly void except as a propaganda tool with which to herd the population in most often illicit nationalistic pursuits manifested as handouts to ourselves that our minders may exact an ever-increasing commission.  Somehow today's citizen can't draw the simplest of connections between their survival and the fundamentals of thou shalt not.  It is one thing for the immoral majority to ignore God’s law and natural law, it is however a death sentence, when leaders and government legitimize the immoral. 

Yours truly,

 Stalin,  Hitler,  Mao,  Pol Pot,  G.A. Custer, et al 

[Art.] l0. [Right of Revolution.]  Government being instituted for the common benefit, protection, and security, of the whole community, and not for the private interest or emolument of any one man, family, or class of men; therefore, whenever the ends of government are perverted, and public liberty manifestly endangered, and all other means of redress are ineffectual, the people may, and of right ought to reform the old, or establish a new government.  The doctrine of nonresistance against arbitrary power, and oppression, is absurd, slavish, and destructive of the good and happiness of mankind.

                              --New Hampshire Constitution (rightfully never amended) June 2, l784

"To consider the judges as the ultimate arbiters of all constitutional questions [is] a very dangerous doctrine indeed, and one which would place us under the despotism of an oligarchy. Our judges are as honest as other men and not more so. They have with others the same passions for party, for power, and the privilege of their corps. Their maxim is boni judicis est ampliare jurisdictionem [good justice is broad jurisdiction], and their power the more dangerous as they are in office for life and not responsible, as the other functionaries are, to the elective control. The Constitution has erected no such single tribunal, knowing that to whatever hands confided, with the corruptions of time and party, its members would become despots. It has more wisely made all the departments co-equal and co-sovereign within themselves."

--Thomas Jefferson to William C. Jarvis, 1820. ME 15:277

"In denying the right [the Supreme Court usurps] of exclusively explaining the Constitution, I go further than [others] do, if I understand rightly [this] quotation from the Federalist of an opinion that 'the judiciary is the last resort in relation to the other departments of the government, but not in relation to the rights of the parties to the compact under which the judiciary is derived.' If this opinion be sound, then indeed is our Constitution a complete felo de se [act of suicide]. For intending to establish three departments, coordinate and independent, that they might check and balance one another, it has given, according to this opinion, to one of them alone the right to prescribe rules for the government of the others, and to that one, too, which is unelected by and independent of the nation. For experience has already shown that the impeachment it has provided is not even a scare-crow... The Constitution on this hypothesis is a mere thing of wax in the hands of the judiciary, which they may twist and shape into any form they please."

--Thomas Jefferson to Spencer Roane, 1819. ME 15:212

"Don’t conclude that you are a good person when in the face of wrong doing you say or doing nothing to avoid potential personal harm but be rightfully embarrassed as it smacks of complicity and all too soon evil will prevail."

-- author unknown